Shhhhh: Silently Altering Quoted Material

Sometimes quotes just don’t want to fit within the structure of our sentences. Unless you are in a legal field, some sciences, or writing for a UK publisher, you can silently tame quoted material in a number of permissible ways. This means that you don’t have to flag your insertions, deletions, and changes by using brackets, ellipses, or footnotes. I’ll break the rules down by major academic style guide.

The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, § 11.8

OK to change silently:

  • case of quotation’s first letter (“paradigms of excellence” to “Paradigms of excellence,” for instance)
  • single quotation marks to double, and vice versa
  • final punctuation that doesn’t fit the grammar of your own sentence, except question marks, exclamation marks, semicolons, colons, and dashes that are not original to the quotation—these must be placed outside the quotation marks
  • endnote and footnote callouts (they can be omitted in quotation)
  • Fraktur and archaic letters (“goodneʃs” to “goodness” and “Vnited” to “United,” for example)

Not OK to change silently:

  • omitted material (use ellipses)
  • inserted material (enclose in brackets)
  • added emphasis, usually expressed in italics (note by inserting “emphasis added” in brackets after the quote)
  • clarifications (“he [James] spoke of troubled times”)

MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 7th edition, § 3.7

OK to change silently:

  • closing punctuation (quoted material woven into the end of your own declarative sentence can take a period even if not in the original)

Not OK to change silently:

  • basically everything else: capitalization, spelling, interior punctuation, omissions, additions, emphasis, inserted explanations

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edition, § 6.07

OK to change silently:

  • case of quotation’s first letter (“Diamond in the rough” can be changed to “diamond in the rough,” or vice versa)
  • end punctuation (original material ending in a period can be presented as ending in a comma, for instance)
  • single quotation marks to double quotation marks (and double to single)

Not OK to change silently:

  • additions
  • deletions
  • emphasis
  • inserted clarifications

Thus, those in literature (MLA users) are more restricted than those in history, religious studies, and the social sciences (APA and Chicago users). Note that Chicago is a bit more thorough than APA, so APA users may consider following the Chicago rules where APA is vague.

Chicago also embraces what I think is a magnanimous gesture: silently correcting obvious typographical errors. This is preferred to the potentially discourteous use of [sic] to point out the errors of those gone before. (Sic is a Latin term meaning “as such.”) Most of us would rather that others not point out our (or our publisher’s!) errors when quoting us down the line, so be generous when you quote others. Be sure, however, that you are not altering an intentionally unconventional construction or the idiosyncracies of earlier historical moments!

The bottom line is that you always want to be sure that you are reproducing quoted material in good faith—that is, that you are not intentionally or even inadvertently changing the meaning of the original source. But you also want to keep your reader’s eye moving, unobstructed by needless jarring brackets. Always be judicious in your handling of quoted material. Think of those around you: the author of the borrowed material and your reader both.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
This entry was posted in punctuation, style. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Shhhhh: Silently Altering Quoted Material

  1. Richard says:

    What does CMS suggest for altering the grammar of a quotation? If the source reads “to go where no one has gone before and to dream the impossible dream,” what must I do to properly write “… going where no one has gone before and dreaming the impossible dream”? I am inclined to place “going” and “dreaming” in brackets.

    • TWEED Editing says:

      Chicago suggests keeping your own grammar in tact and using only the snippets of the quote that you absolutely need. You might write:

      –He suggests going “where no one has gone before” and dreaming “the impossible dream.”–

      This method works best when you can change the syntax more significantly—perhaps “journeying” and “imagining,” for instance. Such substitutions would seem contrived in this example, which depends on the repetition for its impact. In this case, then, you can absolutely use the bracketing method you describe:

      –He suggests “[going] where no one has gone before and [dreaming] the impossible dream.”–

      Or, less invasively:

      –He suggests going “where no one has gone before and [dreaming] the impossible dream.”–

      But Chicago reminds us that brackets are distracting to readers and highlight the mismatch between your sentence and the quoted material. You want to impart, even in what may seem implicit and superficial ways, that you are in control of the material and not bending it to fit your argument. So try the first method where possible.

      Thanks for the question!

  2. Girl Editor says:

    What does CMoS say about inserting serial commas into quoted material? I’m adding them throughout the author’s original text, but don’t know what to about the direct quotes from other sources.

  3. TWEED Editing says:

    Girl Editor, I’m sorry I missed your post a few weeks ago! Let me get back to you right away.

    The 16th edition of Chicago addresses these matters in § 13.7-8, and the allowances are basically the same as in the 15th edition. CMOS does not directly address the matter of adding serial commas, but I would caution against it for a couple reasons.

    First, serial commas are a choice—a strongly preferred choice by most academic style guides, but a choice nonetheless. Second, you would have to carefully consider the source, which you only have access to secondarily, through the text you are editing. Perhaps adding a serial comma would alter the passage’s meaning, if only slightly.

    Long story short, you can’t feel bad for NOT altering a quotation, but you do need to be justified in any changes that you do make. Since CMOS does not explicitly empower this change, I’d leave the quotations alone.

    But I, like you, would notice every time that I felt the beloved serial comma went missing!

  4. Terence says:

    I see a lot of interesting posts on your website. You have to
    spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of time,
    there is a tool that creates unique, SEO friendly articles
    in couple of minutes, just search in google – k2 unlimited content

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>